individuals of the group and group of individuals
We want to know why some individuals emphasize the freedom of the individual and others the freedom of the group. This affords us the two party system reflecting socially active government for the group and government for the constitutionally capitalist individual. Is this philosophical or neural? Is the group's right to the individual's production opposed to the individual's right to freedom? The group, to provides its benefits, is more interested in stability for the sake of preservation of the group rather than any great leap forward that might be afforded by the individual who excels. The group cannot protect anyone unless it controls and the individual must not make that in any way difficult or he will be restricted or limited. Therefore if too much freedom for the individual encourages excessive production, it also allows freer reign resulting in chaos and insecurity for the group. Conversely, too little freedom for the individual and the group begins consume itself. What this makes clear is that restricting the individual and the resulting lack of production means the consumers debilitate and stagnate the group's advancement. This is more undesirable, one should think, than excessive freedom of the individual since production is a positive event even in the group's lexicon, not just the individual's.
The title of this blog, God is the Spiritual Personification of Existence, is based on the first definition perception of ancient writers in the dawn of our known history.
Today's Supreme Being is not the original definition. First report accepted was God defined Himself as Existence. "I am that I am." He did not create existence, He is the fountainhead of Existence. Therefore, God is not only understood to be a Spirit, but also as the spiritual 'personification' of existence. This is a definition, not a theory.
There are both concrete and abstract forces, the seen and the unseen, such as gravity. There are spirits in bottles, spirits in words, spirits in us. The spirit animates everything, from gravity to emotion, as well as semantically. This blog is about defining the usually undefined term God, not religion, but what is meant by the term God.
There is one blog touching on religion, Church and Faith Pulpit Rock, about Christian atheism found in many churches, which themselves quite often have less to do with God or even religion for that matter, than they do with social entertainment.
The blog linked below, Specific Theory of Existence, takes us to essay attempts suggested by former atheists who are sensitive to atheist thought. They are exploring views relating to seen and unseen physics, the known unknown, with the unknown not yet known.
Other blogs, like Memory Stones about cemeteries, touch on other subjects of passing interest. That link and others can be found below. They are hosted by Spencer Corkum for the Sunset Strollers and the QuokeBlokes. They are not carved in 'stone' but may be continuously edited and updated. Davin Paralee, representing the Paraclete, is Editor in Charge.
All things seen come from the unseen and will return there. Since we know so little of all that can be known, in order to make a decision now it must be made in faith because we are deciding without all the facts. There are those who wish to survive the falling away of the body and those who desire slipping into oblivion which is a destruction of that which existed. This too is a spirit and cannot die.
Generalities speak to generalities and specifics to specifics. To intertwine the two is jumping categories, and a fallacy in logic.
An example of what a man says is an illustration of his argument, but it is not proof.
No comments:
Post a Comment