Wednesday, 28 September 2011

acknowledging characteristics

Individuals become afraid at certain points but each of our two individual types are generally afraid of different fears. Many individuals become afraid of foreign attack and competition, the central feature of their fear is wariness of other people outside the larger group. We can label them conservative. They want to conserve and produce for the future to protect long term absolutes mentioned earlier, above all the spiritual rights of the individual. The opposing view is more afraid of inanimate forces like weather, loss of food and energy for physical comfort and sustainability of the group. They are free, or liberal, with greater concern for all material advantages and want to everyone to be able to consume without any emphasis on production, opposite of the conservative. Adlai Stevenson while running for the presidency against Eisenhower embodied the liberal view when he reportedly said that the nation had passed from the age of production into the age of consumption. The liberal view is little concerned with production and more involved in distribution of production as soon as possible. The conservative view on the other hand is more concerned with production and takes a longer term view of consumption. When the 1935 Social Security Act debate was taking place, Republicans were more concerned than Democrats with the long term shown in their reaction to the possible use of social security numbers to identify citizens. They were answered by the Democratic side with now famous comment like in the long term we are all dead and reassurances social security numbers would not be used to identify citizens. They were correct within their short term time frame while the Republicans were also correct, within their longer term time frame.
So far we have isolated the opposing emphasis on either production or consumption, a short and or a long term time frame, and fear of other people outside the greater group and the fear of inanimate forces that form sustainability and quality of life limitation fears. All human characteristics can be sorted in the similar emphasis hierarchies. These easily predictable differences remain an undercurrent of the seldom stated in public debate and if acknowledged would save a lot of yakkity yak.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The title of this blog, God is the Spiritual Personification of Existence, is based on the first definition perception of ancient writers in the dawn of our known history.

Today's Supreme Being is not the original definition. First report accepted was God defined Himself as Existence. "I am that I am." He did not create existence, He is the fountainhead of Existence. Therefore, God is not only understood to be a Spirit, but also as the spiritual 'personification' of existence. This is a definition, not a theory.

There are both concrete and abstract forces, the seen and the unseen, such as gravity. There are spirits in bottles, spirits in words, spirits in us. The spirit animates everything, from gravity to emotion, as well as semantically. This blog is about defining the usually undefined term God, not religion, but what is meant by the term God.

There is one blog touching on religion, Church and Faith Pulpit Rock, about Christian atheism found in many churches, which themselves quite often have less to do with God or even religion for that matter, than they do with social entertainment.

The blog linked below, Specific Theory of Existence, takes us to essay attempts suggested by former atheists who are sensitive to atheist thought. They are exploring views relating to seen and unseen physics, the known unknown, with the unknown not yet known.

Other blogs, like Memory Stones about cemeteries, touch on other subjects of passing interest. That link and others can be found below. They are hosted by Spencer Corkum for the Sunset Strollers and the QuokeBlokes. They are not carved in 'stone' but may be continuously edited and updated. Davin Paralee, representing the Paraclete, is Editor in Charge.

SAC Vet, BU grad.

My photo
The man with an experience is never at the mercy of the man with a theory, even if it is his own. The Spirit deep within speaks only to each one of us and does not tell us anything about others, or what they are to think or do. We each speak the words we are told by our spirit which cannot be held back, by this our witness is revealed. Words are the fruit of whatever spirit they describe. Words are powerful, they reveal the spirit that drives them. Passersby are welcome to comment in the same spirit as the content posted on this blog.
All things seen come from the unseen and will return there. Since we know so little of all that can be known, in order to make a decision now it must be made in faith because we are deciding without all the facts. There are those who wish to survive the falling away of the body and those who desire slipping into oblivion which is a destruction of that which existed. This too is a spirit and cannot die.
Generalities speak to generalities and specifics to specifics. To intertwine the two is jumping categories, and a fallacy in logic.

An example of what a man says is an illustration of his argument, but it is not proof.