Wednesday, 30 November 2011

motivation in a tangle of lies

It is better, if one were without a choice, not to listen to what people say, but more to their motivation for saying it in the first place. It will tell us more and be grist for our bone fide built-in dung detectors. Also note the emphasis, which will reveal much as well. We see politicians talk. See, rather than listen, because they speak of things they never do and never truly think of doing. They want to get elected and will tickle your ears with anything they think you want to hear. Still, I do not call them liars because that is the job of another spirit I prefer not to entangle myself. It is not fruitful to open up a line of conversation about any particular person telling lies. Just as a man calls another a liar because he himself is a liar, he may often be projecting out from himself what he accuses others of doing. The deepest liar, like the most shallow of liars, thinks others are lying because he himself is doing it and if you are not lying, then why aren't you? It is a good idea not to have anything to do whatever with specific lies. What good would be accomplished anyway, or tell others about yourself, that one was an expert on the lies of other people?

No comments:

Post a Comment

The title of this blog, God is the Spiritual Personification of Existence, is based on the first definition perception of ancient writers in the dawn of our known history.

Today's Supreme Being is not the original definition. First report accepted was God defined Himself as Existence. "I am that I am." He did not create existence, He is the fountainhead of Existence. Therefore, God is not only understood to be a Spirit, but also as the spiritual 'personification' of existence. This is a definition, not a theory.

There are both concrete and abstract forces, the seen and the unseen, such as gravity. There are spirits in bottles, spirits in words, spirits in us. The spirit animates everything, from gravity to emotion, as well as semantically. This blog is about defining the usually undefined term God, not religion, but what is meant by the term God.

There is one blog touching on religion, Church and Faith Pulpit Rock, about Christian atheism found in many churches, which themselves quite often have less to do with God or even religion for that matter, than they do with social entertainment.

The blog linked below, Specific Theory of Existence, takes us to essay attempts suggested by former atheists who are sensitive to atheist thought. They are exploring views relating to seen and unseen physics, the known unknown, with the unknown not yet known.

Other blogs, like Memory Stones about cemeteries, touch on other subjects of passing interest. That link and others can be found below. They are hosted by Spencer Corkum for the Sunset Strollers and the QuokeBlokes. They are not carved in 'stone' but may be continuously edited and updated. Davin Paralee, representing the Paraclete, is Editor in Charge.

SAC Vet, BU grad.

My photo
The man with an experience is never at the mercy of the man with a theory, even if it is his own. The Spirit deep within speaks only to each one of us and does not tell us anything about others, or what they are to think or do. We each speak the words we are told by our spirit which cannot be held back, by this our witness is revealed. Words are the fruit of whatever spirit they describe. Words are powerful, they reveal the spirit that drives them. Passersby are welcome to comment in the same spirit as the content posted on this blog.
All things seen come from the unseen and will return there. Since we know so little of all that can be known, in order to make a decision now it must be made in faith because we are deciding without all the facts. There are those who wish to survive the falling away of the body and those who desire slipping into oblivion which is a destruction of that which existed. This too is a spirit and cannot die.
Generalities speak to generalities and specifics to specifics. To intertwine the two is jumping categories, and a fallacy in logic.

An example of what a man says is an illustration of his argument, but it is not proof.